Sunday, May. 19, 2013

ASCD Responds to President Obama’s 2013 State of the Union Address

Written By:

|

February 12, 2013

|

Posted In:

Tags:

In this evening’s State of the Union address, President Obama laid out a number of proposals touching on our education system.

We agree that high-quality pre-school education has tremendous long-term benefits for students and the country. As ASCD is the association dedicated to supporting the success of each learner, we heartily applaud and eagerly look forward to hearing more details on the President’s call for universal pre-school for all children.

Likewise, ASCD is supportive of efforts to graduate students that are college, career and citizenship ready. The President’s proposal to redesign America’s high schools so they better equip graduates for the demands of a high-tech economy is consistent with our goals.

Finally, the President has asked Congress to change the Higher Education Act so that affordability and value are included in determining which colleges receive certain types of federal aid. This is an intriguing idea that may help increase access to higher education for millions of American students, and we at ASCD look forward to hearing additional information on this plan.

Unfortunately, in this evening’s remarks, the President did not adequately address what we at ASCD see as a primary weakness in current federal K-12 policy, the lack of a reauthorized Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA). We at ASCD reiterate that our biggest priority this year is for the reauthorization of ESEA with provisions:

  • Creating meaningful accountability systems;
  • Encouraging comprehensive improvement strategies; and
  • Promoting adequate and effective preparation and ongoing professional development for educators to improve student outcomes.

In reauthorizing ESEA, we call on the President, Congress and other policymakers and stakeholders to adhere to the following guiding principles which we believe will help ensure success for students, educators, and education systems:

  • Ensure a whole child education that prepares youth for college, careers, and citizenship; addresses each student’s social, emotional, physical, and academic needs; and provides engaging learning opportunities in a safe and supportive environment.
  • Use multiple measures beyond state standardized test scores to provide a comprehensive picture of student proficiency, educator effectiveness, and school quality.
  • Provide sufficient time and resources for school improvement strategies that support an enriched curriculum, enhance the school culture, and are commensurate with the school’s need.
  • Ensure educator evaluations use multiple measures and lead to professional development opportunities that build the capacity of districts and schools to improve student outcomes.

Education leaders are continually instituting innovative practices and implementing systemic reforms in their ongoing commitment to support student’s success and school improvement. Unfortunately, federal education policies have not kept pace and are, indeed, hindering innovation and progress. The current version ESEA is badly out of date and more than five years overdue for revision. This delay in reauthorization has prompted a patchwork of temporary solutions that are neither ideal nor lasting.

In addition to calling for the reauthorization of ESEA, ASCD also asks the President and Congress to collaborate and find an alternative to the scheduled March 1 sequestration that protects education funding. As a healthy education system is a critical component to ensuring the future economic health of the country, we at this juncture, cannot afford what will be the largest cut to education spending in history.

ASCD calls on the President and Congress to collaborate to solve these two issues as soon as possible. Doing so would provide the nation’s educators, students, parents and other stakeholders certainty as to both the priorities of our national education policy, and the resources available to implement them.

Share This Article

Related News

About Author

avatar

David Griffith, ASCD Public Policy

David Griffith leads the development and implementation of ASCD’s legislative agenda, as well as ASCD’s efforts to influence education decision making at the local, state, and federal levels. He has 20 years of political experience as both a congressional aide and on several political campaigns. Prior to joining ASCD in 2009, Griffith was the director of governmental and public affairs for the National Association of State Boards of Education, where he oversaw the organization’s advocacy and political activities as well as media relations.

Related Posts

(4) Readers Comments

  1. avatar
    Lynn Hughes
    February 12, 2013 at 11:09 pm

    In my opinion, politicians and state departments of education rely too heavily on test score data in evaluating students, teacher effectiveness, and school districts. In addition, as a teacher I feel hampered by the current trend to 'teach to the test' because it is not effectively educating our students. We cannot teach without the funding to do so. I teach in a 100% poverty school district. Most of our classes do not have textbooks, and those that do are woefully out of date and in poor repair. If the government wants us to educate students in order to ensure our future, we need the resources to do it, and we need effective evaluation methods other than the state tests.

    • avatar
      Bethany Campbell
      February 13, 2013 at 8:13 pm

      I agree with Lynn in that our nation depends on these tests to make evaluations not only for where the money is going but also on how well teachers and their students are doing. I do not agree that this is the best way to make these decisions. Money should be evenly distributed so that all schools have the opportunity to teach on an exemplary level despite the level of income of the surrounding community. How does our nation expect to help students who come from low-income neighborhoods to succeed if a majority of the funding is going to communities with the higher incomes. I understand that taxes pay for the schools but there is no reason that funds could not be distributed more equally. I also am curious about the universal pre-school proposal. Are we looking at mandating pre-school as other grades are mandated? If that is the case then I am not in favor of that as there are many pre-school age children who are with stay at home moms and in my opinion are being educated just as well if not better than outside programs. I would not agree with a mandated program. Finally, I am in agreement with ASCD's principles for education that they are calling on our lawmakers to uphold.

  2. avatar
    Erika Madrigal
    February 13, 2013 at 11:10 pm

    State assessments as a measure of student success often leads to anxiety in my classroom of students. Children, with their diverse learning styles, should be afforded an opportunity to be evaluated using a variety of accountability measures. Doing so empowers students to put forth their personal best and optimistically look toward their future.

  3. avatar
    Todd Huss
    February 17, 2013 at 11:44 am

    I think we are getting too much testing. I understand we need to know what the student is underachieving in, but when do we actually have time to teach when we are constantly testing. Maybe if were to go back to teaching to master a small amount of concepts and skills instead of teaching a lot of material and being mediocre at everything.

Leave A Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>